Criterion 2 - Teaching-Learning and Evaluation
Key Indicator - 2.5 Evaluation Process and Reforms
2.5.1
Average number of days from the date of last semester-end/ yearend examination till the last date of declaration of results during the last five years
Response: 18.12
2.5.1.1: Number of days from the date of last semester-end/ year- end examination till the last date of declaration of results year wise during the last five years
Year |
2022-2023 |
2021-2022 |
2020-2021 |
2019-2020 |
2018-2019 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of days |
14.74 |
16.89 |
24 |
21 |
14 |
2.5.2
Percentage of student complaints/grievances about evaluation against total number appeared in the examinations during the last five years
Response: 0.056
2.5.2.1: Number of complaints/grievances about evaluation year wise during last five years
Year |
2022-2023 |
2021-2022 |
2020-2021 |
2019-2020 |
2018-2019 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
No of Students appeared |
5257 |
4837 |
4402 |
3944 |
3764 |
No of Complaints/Grievances |
64 |
50 |
74 |
52 |
44 |
No of Changes |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
3 |
No of Grievances |
1 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
Percentage |
0.019 |
0.041 |
0.022 |
0.10 |
0.10 |
Average Percentage |
0.0564 |
2.5.2.2: Number of students appeared in the examination conducted by the institution year wise during the last five years
Year |
2022-2023 |
2021-2022 |
2020-2021 |
2019-2020 |
2018-2019 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
No of Students appeared |
5257 |
4837 |
4402 |
3944 |
3764 |
2.5.3
IT integration and reforms in the examination procedures and processes including Continuous Internal Assessment (CIA)/Formative Assessment have brought in considerable improvement in Examination Management System (EMS) of the Institution
The college has a well-established and efficient centralized examination system open for modifications and thus strengthens it fromtime to time, ensuring the system fool proof and addresses the grievances of students, if any. The institutional reforms in all the activities of the examination system are kept at par with the reforms pushed by the UGC for various engineering disciplines. The IT integration and reforms in the examination procedures of engineering education taken up by the premier technical institutions have been incorporated into our examination system and include OBE- frame work for assessment process,evaluation of higher order abilities and professional skills in different forms like MOOCs, project works, bloom’s taxonomy for assessment design etc.
The following significant reforms were effected in the Examination system:
1. Credit system was introduced for the benefit of the students.
2. Tools of information technology are utilized for most of the activities associated with the conduct of examinations, evaluation and declaration of results.
3. Continuous Internal Assessment (CIA) twice in a semester for each course, periodical assignments/tests/quizzes etc. to keep the students meaning fully engaged with the subject content throughout the semester.
A list of reforms and the positive impacts are given below:
1. Two sets of question papers are maintained for each subject.
Positive impact:
a. Confidentiality in the question paper selection.
2. Setting the question papers from all the units with internal choice and moderation of question papers.
Positive impact:
a. Maintain standards and coverage of syllabus among all the units.
b. Students are required to study all the units in a given course.
c. Improve the course outcomes by implementing internal choice.
3. Preparation of detailed scheme of evaluation by internal subject experts.
Positive impact:
a.Uniformity in the evaluation among the evaluators and fair judgment for the students.
4. Appointment of squad consisting of senior faculty members to monitor the semester end examinations.
Positive impact:
a. Strict vigilance for smooth conduct of examinations.
5. Establishment of Spot evaluation center.
Positive impact:
a. Confidentiality and custody of answer booklets are ensured.
b. Declaration of results within the stipulated time.
6. Establishment of CCTV Surveillance System.
Positive impact:
a. Continuous monitoring of activities of examination section and spot evaluation process.
b. Restricted entry and surveillance of the entry of un-authorized persons into the examination section.
c. CCTVs in the vicinity of the examination.
d. Rooms to curb untoward incidents of mal-practice.
7. Encoding and decoding of answer booklets.
Positive impact:
a. Provides confidentiality and unbiased evaluation.
8. Automation of examination management system.
Positive impact:
a. Improvement in reliability, efficiency, security, transparency, confidentiality and accuracy in the entire process.
9. Personal verification and revaluation system.
Positive impact:
a. Accountability of the evaluation process and improving the transparency in the evaluation.
10. Advance Supplementary examinations and timely publication of results & issuing necessary certificates in time.
Positive impact:
a. Provides more Scope to final year students for their placements and higher studies.
11. Inclusion of security features in grade sheets as well as in answer booklets.
Positive impact:
a. Chances of manipulations are nullified.